jeudi 30 mai 2024

Megan Ganz's concept of humanity

Megan Ganz had a concise description of Dan Harmon, when asked by a journalist what she thinks of him:

"He's a work-in-progress"

She adds:

"That’s how I think of myself, too".

When you have a concept that encompasses yourself and others, you have nothing short of a working definition of humanity.

Here, that's not theoretical philosophy. This statement by Megan Ganz came 6 years after Dan Harmon harassed her at the work place, and a few days after he publicly apologised, without naming her. She felt so safe after his apology that she publicly forgave him, thereby disclosing her name.

A crucial part of Dan Harmon’s apology is this: 

"I certainly wouldn’t have been able to do it if I had any respect for women on a fundamental level. I was thinking about them as different creatures. I was thinking about the ones that I liked as having some special role in my life, and I did it all by not thinking about it".

Dan Harmon describes his earlier perception of Megan Ganz as a perfect entity, as someone who is completely described by what she is, and not as someone imperfect, in the process of becoming what she wants to be, with her own personal, secret trajectory. And Dan Harmon understands that his earlier perception was faulty. It took 6 years to people as intelligent as Megan Ganz and Dan Harmon, for him to understand this, and for her to calmly express it publicly (but she understood immediately, not after 6 years, as we can see in the links below).

This is of enormous consequences. It holds the key to reverse the weaponisation of identities, a trap many, if not most, of even our most accomplished intellectuals fall in, today.

That we are all work-in-progress, and at the same time, all helping each-other, makes all of us, everyone of us, a teacher of humanity.

It is one thing to deliberate about concepts from the comfort of a settled life, another one to create the concept out of your direct encounter with the forces of life. What you create then, is a new reality, a new world, a new space and a new language, that enables human encounter to happen and in fact, life itself, of which humans are a part, to grow. Concepts, when born out of life and lived truly, are the most powerful things we can create, and have a power that extends far beyond our individual lives.

We can be grateful to Megan Ganz and Dan Harmon for treading this path, not theoretically but by their own courageous lives.

Dan Harmon’s apology (starts at 18'):

http://www.harmontown.com/2018/01/episode-dont-let-him-wipe-or-flush/

The full transcript:

https://slate.com/arts/2018/01/dan-harmon-apologizes-to-community-writer-megan-ganz-on-harmontown.html

Some introduction and context:

https://www.vulture.com/2018/01/it-took-me-years-to-believe-in-my-talents-again-read-this-twitter-exchange-between-megan-ganz-and-dan-harmon.html

https://www.indiewire.com/features/general/dan-harmon-megan-ganz-apology-1201916560/


jeudi 16 mai 2024

Loyalty vs Obedience

We have to think of loyalty not necessarily to someone or something, but as an intransitive verb. Being loyal is an action springing from the depth of the I, on its own ground, and for this reason loyalty always finds a just way to be loyal to everyone and everything together, even enemies. Loyalty always takes full responsibility for its actions.

By contrast, obedience is always to someone or something. It is a sacrifice of one's own ground, a renunciation of responsibility, and it is exclusive: You can never obey two enemies together.

Loyalty strengthens the I, obedience weakens the I.

This has a strong relationship to algebra: Defining one's loyalty to apparently conflicting people or agendas, is the same as solving a system of multiple equations, for which the "x" is the I. Clarifying the equations and solving them in action build the I.

By contrast, obedience has no agency in posing equations, even less solving them, because the "x" is already given, and one has to shrink oneself to fit in.

Only a strong I can defend morality.

mardi 7 mai 2024

Swissair


Jean-Marc Reiser, l'Hebdo Hara-Kiri n°85, 14 septembre 1970

Pierre Fournier, l'Hebdo Hara-Kiri n°86, 21 septembre 1970

C'est pas facile de trouver des dessins gentils pour les Palestiniens dans la presse Française... en voilà deux autres!

Si vous en connaissez d'autres, envoyez-les moi ou mettez un lien en commentaire. Merci!

Quand les Palestiniens ont bousillé des avions, ils étaient vides et au sol

 

Jean-Marc Reiser, Charlie Hebdo n° 121 du 12 mars 1973

C'est pas facile de trouver des dessins gentils pour les Palestiniens dans la presse Française... en voilà un autre!

Notice of Liability delivered to Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Dr Maria van Kerkhove, Dr Janet Diaz and Jeremy Farrar

Notice of Liability delivered to Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Dr Maria van Kerkhove, Dr Janet Diaz and Jeremy Farrar

https://open.substack.com/pub/drtesslawrie/p/the-notice-of-liability-delivered

Full text:

The Notice of Liability delivered to individuals at the W.H.O. this week

Addressing both corporate and personal liability in wrongdoing


Below you will find the text of the Notice of Liability delivered to Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Dr Maria van Kerkhove, Dr Janet Diaz and Jeremy Farrar this week. It was drafted with the help of specialist international lawyers and health scientists. Feel free to copy, paste and adapt for the purpose of notifying others of their liability in relation to the Covid-19 fraud.

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus: a man

dba: Director General World Health Organisation (WHO)

Office of the Director General

Avenue Appia 20

1202 Geneva - Switzerland       

6th day in the month of May in the year 2024

Dear Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (hereafter ‘you’),

Re: Notice upon Harm and to Cease and Desist

On behalf of living men, women and all their sons and daughters living right now and those yet to be born on Earth, we hereby place you: a man: Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, doing business as the Director General of the World Health Organisation (hereafter W.H.O), on notice that:

  1. Your actions carried out in the capacity of Director General of the W.H.O during the Covid-19 chapter, principally consisting of falsely informing world governments of a so-called pandemic, thereby causing governments to declare non-existent medical emergencies, have been and are still an integral part of a chain of events that is resulting in mass loss of life, immense physical harm and untold psychological distress and trauma to the people on this planet;

  2. Said actions appear to have led to Governments deploying insufficiently tested SARS-CoV-2 genetically modified organisms (GMOs) falsely termed ‘vaccines’ being also gene therapies, mandating unscientific masking protocols, implementing inhumane and anti-scientific ‘social distancing’ measures, purchasing and deploying ineffective and fraudulent PCR tests subsequently used to create false ‘casedemics’ in order to justify unlawful ‘lockdowns’, business closures and house arrest;

  3. We demand that, with immediate effect, you cease and desist from taking further actions that would involve false and fraudulent communication to governments thereby causing or resulting in further instances of the kind of catastrophic outcomes outlined above.

Notice upon Personal Liability

We also put you on notice that failure to cease or desist from continued or repeated involvement or implication in the above harms shall render you liable both in your personal and corporate capacity. As a man, you shall be investigated for criminal conspiracy. As a corporate officer, you shall be investigated for gross negligence, serious misconduct in public office, corporate fraud and potentially even aiding and abetting corporate manslaughter.

Further to the above Notices, and in order to clarify our position, may we take this opportunity respectfully to remind you of your own position and legal responsibilities.

WHO Constitutional Obligation

The objective of the World Health Organization (WHO), according to Article 1 of the WHO Constitution, is the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health.1 Thus, in your role as WHO Director-General, you are obliged to consult with a diversity of experts, including those who disagree with your recommendations on health, to ensure that best practice is ethically and objectively promoted to uphold the best interests of the public.

As early as 2021, international experts were cautioning against the novel Covid strategies recommended by the WHO Covid team, especially but not limited to the experimental modRNA medical technologies developed at ‘warp speed’ to function purportedly as vaccines.

The WHO Constitution states in Article 67 that members of the WHO may enjoy ‘such privileges and immunities as may be necessary for the fulfilment of its objective and for the exercise of its functions.” Such privileges and immunity, whilst patently unfair, inequitable and dangerous, only apply when fulfilling the Article 1 objective.

By your unilateral recommendation of harmful Covid strategies, The People, represented by the World Council for Health, do not believe that you acted in accordance with your constitutional obligations in Article 1. If your actions are found to be in contravention of Article 1, you will not be covered by Article 67 of the WHO Constitution that provides for the stated protection and immunity. In other words, you may be personally liable for the millions of deaths and immense suffering caused on account of your role in the unlawful authorisation of these harmful recommendations. Moreover, given the blatant conflicts of interest evident in the WHO’s activities, closely connected to commercial interests, immunity is not guaranteed when acting at the behest of those interests.

Consequences of your WHO Covid Policies, Recommendations, Advice and Omissions

1. Immeasurable suffering and death

In the past four years, billions of people who trusted and complied with WHO-based country government advice have experienced ongoing physical and mental suffering, illness, disability, loss of income, poverty, child abuse, other violence, and even death as a result.

2. Human rights violations

Country governments worldwide implemented severe emergency measures directly based on WHO recommendations that consequently resulted in widespread violations of fundamental human rights. Boys, girls and babies were masked and injected. Living men and women expressing, or wishing to express their right to free speech, travel, bodily autonomy, and to choose, were threatened, intimidated, coerced, neglected, abused and in some cases assaulted, imprisoned or killed. The WHO did nothing to address the harm it caused.

3. Failure to recommend inexpensive, safe and effective treatments and remedies for Covid-19

Covid-19 can be effectively treated with safe and established multi-purpose generic medicines, including ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, in combination with zinc, vitamin D, vitamin C, and other immune-boosting, health-promoting and anti-coagulant treatments. Failure to disclose and raise awareness of these, and failure to recommend ivermectin widely in combination with zinc for early use, meant that millions of people suffered and many died as a result of not being offered effective early and late treatments.

By recommending ivermectin only in the context of clinical trials and omitting sound and practical advice on how to attain the highest level of health during the Covid-19 scare, ivermectin and other effective treatments were withheld in many countries in favour of expensive GMO drugs, emergency-authorized patented pharmaceutical drugs without safety records. Thus, in your personal capacity, the world’s people may hold you responsible for the consequences of serious omissions related to safe, effective treatments for Covid-19, in preference for undisclosed GMOs.

4. Dangerous GMO gene therapies deployed in the guise of vaccines

You may also be personally liable for death, loss and suffering in relation to the SARS-CoV-2 ‘vaccines’ as you have not advised people of the following:

  1. The long-term material risks of these ‘vaccines’ are unknown. The LNP-modRNA platform fulfils EU, UK, South African, Australian, and US legal definitions for being properly deemed a genetically modified organism (GMO), and a gene therapy, where material risks are identified over a period up to 15 years and perhaps into offspring. People were not advised as required by law that the so-called ‘vaccines’ are, in fact, GMOs.

  2. Pfizer used one process to manufacture the products that they submitted for approval but a different process to manufacture the product supplied for injection into the world’s people. The latter product was manufactured using E.coli bacteria and plasmid DNA which has resulted in excessive synthetic DNA contamination confirmed as able to integrate with the human genome. Moderna’s use of plasmid DNA in manufacture has also led to excessive synthetic DNA contamination.

  3. Pfizer products includes a SV40 virus-derived enhancer gene sequence. This gene sequence is known to facilitate the transport of the synthetic DNA into cell nuclei, posing a real risk of chromosomal integration. This threatens permanent genetic modification of inoculated people without their knowledge or consent and can only be harmful.

  4. The contents of these genetic injections do not stay in the arm muscle.

  5. Spike proteins are produced for a prolonged and unknown period of time, possibly indefinitely.

  6. These spike proteins trigger extensive microvascular blood clotting as well as large vessel blood clots.

  7. Spike proteins are deposited in many tissues and organs including the heart, brain, testis, ovaries, liver and spleen, causing tissue degeneration and disease.

  8. The large quantity of spike proteins may overwhelm the immune system, causing immune system dysfunction and worsening risk of all infections and cancers.

  9. The spike protein is toxic in itself, but this foreign antigen also marks the victims’ own tissues as non-self, triggering autoimmune disease within these tissues.

  10. The antibodies generated are non-neutralizing and worsen Covid disease; this is “antibody dependent enhancement” of infection.

  11. Undeclared plasmid DNA in these products carries further dangers; especially in the case of Pfizer and the concealed SV40 enhancer and promotor sequences. This includes the disruption of tumour suppressor genes, and adds to the list of mechanisms by which these products increase cancer risk.

  12. The artificial modRNA in these products is hyper-persistent due to the substitution of N1-methylpsudouridine in place of uracil. This prolongs the production of the toxic spike proteins, but also causes ribosome frame shifting, such that a variety of unpredictable proteins and polypeptides are also generated. These pose serious risk for triggering a large spectrum of autoimmune diseases.

  13. Additionally the pegylated lipid nanoparticles, which deliver the genetic payload into the victims’ cells, are toxic in and of themselves.

5. Violation of informed consent

Based on your authority as the designated WHO Director General, the majority of people around the world trusted your words when you stated that Covid-19 GMOs and gene therapies were “safe and effective”. This claim cannot be substantiated and is further disproved by Covid-19 vaccine contracts. As such, the right to free and informed consent was violated for every human being who was injected with the experimental Covid-19 GMO gene therapy called ‘vaccines’.

In addition, it appears that at no point did you appraise people of the risks associated with these experimental GMO injections, nor have you shared the mounting vaccine injury reports with the public. Vigibase, the WHO pharmacovigilance collaboration with the University of Uppsala, holds the records of over five million people suspected of harm due to the Covid-19 genetic ‘vaccines’, yet you have failed to demand and ensure transparent, independent and timely analysis of these data.

This is in direct contravention of the Nuremberg Code, that was agreed to in 1948, to prevent non-consensual medical experimentation on human beings, following gross human rights violations during the Second World War.2 Your failure to advise on, recommend, promote and ensure free and informed consent for these Covid-19 GMO gene therapies can be prosecuted for both breach of your duty of care as well as for battery.

World Council for Health Invitation

It is our opinion that the health of the World’s People is much poorer for the actions that you have taken during the course of your work responsibilities at the World Health Organization. In the circumstances, we are morally obliged to invite you to defend your actions or apologise publicly with a plan for reparations. A World Council for Health Country Council General Assembly is scheduled to take place on May 21, 2024, to hear your response and to agree on further necessary actions.

In the interim and in future, we demand that you cease and desist from spreading disinformation about the Covid-19 GMO gene therapy products with immediate effect.

By the men and women named below:

World Council for Health Steering Committee

Shabnam Palesa Mohamed (WCH Africa), Fahrie Hassan (WCH Africa), Emma Sron (WCH N. America), Dr.Marivic Villa (WCH N. Americas), Dr. Mark Trozzi (WCH N. America), Izumi Kamijo (WCH Asia), Rev. Dr. Wai Ching Lee (WCH Asia), Dr. Gilbertha St Rose (WCH Caribbean), Christof Plothe DO (WCH Europe), Dr. Mazen Nasreddine (WCH Levant), Lucinda van Buuren (WCH Oceania), Dr. Anne O’Reilly (WCH Oceania), Prof. Héctor Carvallo (WCH Latin America), Marco Albertazzi (WCH Latin America), Dr. Tess Lawrie (WCH Chief Coordinator)

Notice to principals is notice to agents and vice versa

Swiss solicitor, Philipp Kruse, delivered the notice in person to the WHO headquarters around midday on Monday 6th, 2024. Here he is confirming delivery:

The WHO and its employees can no longer say they are ignorant of the issues and public concerns. Here is the signed receipt of the documents:

The World Council for Health Steering Committee is extremely grateful to lawyers Philipp Kruse, Julian Gillespie, David Adelman and the many, many others who informed, assisted and supported this international collaboration toward truth, justice and accountability.

Thank you for your support!

If you find value in this work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber of this Substack or the World Council for Health Substack, if you have not yet done so. All proceeds go towards the humanitarian work of the World Council for Health.


vendredi 3 mai 2024

If lies can start wars, truth can stop them.


There is an essential difference between truth and love, and it is the exact opposite of what people believe:

Truth can never exist alone. It is a joint effort between at least one person who expresses it and one person who understands it. Sometimes the effort is greater on the side of the one who expresses it, sometimes on the side of the one who understands it, and sometimes appearances are deceptive!

Which leads us to love, which can exist, not of course in isolation but always exclusively on its own foundations. To love is a completely sovereign decision, perhaps the only sovereign decision accessible to us.

Thus, expressing (or “doing”) a truth is an act of love, and understanding it is also an act of love. These 2 free acts are necessary for the truth to exist. But love began before, and above all, it does not depend, on either side, on any condition. She is free and sovereign.

So that's why Julian Assange said that:

"If lies can start wars, truth can stop them".

Julian Assange, indefinitely in jail in the U.K. while the judges of the Western Empire keep trying to clarify, since 14 years already, why they should put him in jail, maybe hoping he will suicide or get a fatal disease, Julian Assange is not only a courageous journalist but a philosopher. 

And maybe his courage and his philosophical clarity are the reason our corrupt western ruling elite is so much afraid of him, and these assholes at "The Guardian" insist he's not a journalist. Because if he's, then clearly they are not.

Today, news are on Telegram channels, substack and rumble. Opinions, admonishing, commentaries and counselling are in the legacy media. Vanessa Beeley, Eva Karen Bartlett, Donbass Devuschka, etc. etc. are all children of Julian Assange, our Socrates who will NOT suicide! ❤