jeudi 9 octobre 2025

The 4 forms of expression of love

Annelies Bruell;

The four forms of expression of love


The question: "How can we recognize the work of destiny in our children and in our co-workers?" and the question that comes next, "How can we ourselves become an instrument for them to fulfill their destiny in a positive way?" can be approached in multiple ways.

I have chosen as a red thread through this labyrinth of possibilities the four forms of expression of the love that is woven between beings. What inner knowledge of destiny can these four manifestations of love give, and what happens on a therapeutic level when we consciously implement any of these four forms of love.

I will begin by describing these four forms: Eros – Storgè – Philia – Agapè.

Eros is that form which emanates from another being and touches my own inner being. Eros is magical. It is perfectly well expressed in Schuré's "Sacred Drama of Eleusis". Persephone is seated in a cave embroidering flowers and inanimate animals on a veil, when Eros comes to tempt her outward by touching the earth with the tip of his arrow, thus calling to life a sweet-smelling flower. Eros is love of the senses, love awakened from without. The love power of Eros is related to sense impressions which can be transformed into life-filled soul forces.

Storgè is the love that takes care, the gaze towards the other, the guardian. Storgè reveals a quality of soul that allows me to relate to those around me in the right way. This is why Storgè for an old person is different from Storgè for an infant, and everything else is Storgè for the earth. When we cultivate Storgè in ourselves right habits take hold; the gestures found in the love of the child for his grandparents, of the father for his son; but also in the love we have for our garden, our tools, our furniture, our clothes. Of course, we find here "the devotion to detail", the irradiation of our soul forces in all our surroundings. Perhaps the purest expression of Storgè can be found in the farmer who, despite wars and catastrophes, plows the earth and plants his seeds.

Philia referred to here should not be confused with the Philia of "Mystery Dramas". Philia is the love that lives in the friendship born of concern for another human being. In the reciprocity of this love one acquires an intimate knowledge of the other, allowing oneself to bear fruit through this friendship, but remaining completely oneself in its specificity. The soul of the other resonates, we hear it. A very fine example of this love-Philia is the friendship that united Goethe and Schiller.

Agape is the most spiritual form of love, barely perceptible physically. The person must take one more step. She was awakened from without, she nurtured and protected, she lovingly watched the souls of others. It must now turn into a disinterested receptacle. Through the power of Agape we need to create a free inner space, in which the inner being of the other can appear. I have to open myself inside so that "You" can live in me. Isn't Saint John leaning over Jesus' chest an archetypal image of this love?

When one begins to feel the different characteristics of these four aspects of love, one also feels the connection of each with the physical body, the etheric body, the astral body and the self. Or, if we start from the human soul, their link with the soul of sensitivity, the soul of heart, the soul of reason and the soul of conscience.

In these lectures on karma, Rudolf Steiner talks about two basic moral dispositions that must be observed by anyone who wants to study karma. I will add that these are the basic conditions for anyone who turns his mind to the fate of his fellows. These predispositions are: respect and the absence of fear.

Respect is the delicate and timid attitude of the soul that marvels at the secrets of the universe, woven like threads from a distant past into the present life.

When, as pedagogue-curative and socio-therapist, we turn actively towards the destiny of a person, we must be filled with courage, we cannot be held back by fear. Because if in all sincerity we turn to the destiny of a child entrusted to us, we immediately realize our own weaknesses, our failures, our hidden desires; it's a dull and very uncomfortable feeling. We need soul courage to look through the illusions and masks that hide reality from us. In the series – Eros, Storgè, Philia, Agapè – at the level of Eros respect is the teacher and courage the companion, at the level of Agape boldness becomes the guide and respect is the discreet and faithful companion.

I would like to show more precisely using a few examples of how these four forms of love work.

1) What happens in the life of a small child if Eros, sensual love has no place? Do we not see present before our eyes these innumerable children already old, gray and sclerotic? Their faces are withered and starved because the joy of the senses has not been given to them. Their senses have never been awakened. I am not speaking only of the senses of the environment, sense of heat, of taste, of smell of sight, the senses of maya and of beauty, but especially of the lower senses. These children have never been cuddled, never felt the happiness of the sense of movement. The higher senses, especially the sense of thought and the sense of self of others, were not experienced through human contact. Radio, TV, cassettes had replaced them.

The second question that should preoccupy us whenever we turn to one of the four aspects of love is: "What happens if the educator consciously acts with one of these four aspects of love?"

What happens when the educator stimulates his own love of the senses? Dr. Lorenz said at a conference that one can "develop the understanding of karma without clairvoyance by the impressions of our senses alone."

In the realm of love-Eros this means that I open myself internally to the other; that with awareness I receive the messages transmitted to me by my five ordinary senses, as well as by my higher senses.

Every characteristic of the child speaks to me intensely: his light, tiptoe gait, his energetic step that rushes forward, his gesture of always wanting to cling to things and people, his fingers wide open and spread, his mania for pulling up his pants, his slight hesitation that punctuates the end of each of his sentences...

If the curative pedagogues welcome each of these sensory revelations with respect, with astonishment, then there will awaken in them a true knowledge of the heart and not an intellectual interpretation – this has one meaning, that another. Their sense of thought will unite all of these separate sensory observations into one meaningful whole.

As teachers of future healing pedagogues we will have accomplished a great task when students, enlivened and sensitized by artistic work, can be filled with wonder before a child, wondering how his individuality can master such a sick body. Through this attitude of wonder, an instinctive knowledge will awaken in everyone to perceive where and how they can begin to complete what is missing in the development of the child.

The importance of the responsibility of the educator is clearly expressed in these words of Rudolf Steiner: "Sensory experiences form the organs of the child".

2) What nourishment do we bring to the child through love-Storgè? We structure his earthly home, the envelopes in which the child must live. We help the child fulfill his destiny in his own body, in his own environment; When, in our centers, we establish right habits, the child can be helped to reinforce his envelopes, he penetrates himself with regular rhythms of life, with repetitions; The characteristic of Eros was "to awaken", that of Storgè is to "let grow".

In our centers in Scotland, we receive a very special type of child: although they received a lot of affection from their parents, they nevertheless grew up without any Storgè love. If one visits parents at home, one finds oneself in a room without any warmth or comfort, there is no furniture; the TV is in a corner, there is no table or chairs; everyone sits down. Children from such backgrounds are often open and naive, warm and affectionate, but at the age of puberty they have enormous social problems. They get sucked into sexuality and have no control over themselves. They could not consolidate their envelopes through righteous social habits; the rising force of astrality springs forth unopposed in their physical functions.

What does the curative pedagogue do when consciously acting with Storgè love? We have seen that wonder was the teacher of Eros; Storgè can be deepened when we ask ourselves the question: "what do the objects and tools around us represent for us, in ourselves? That is: how does a broom ask to be handled? What kinds of attention do silk and linen require? What makes a saw always sharp for woodworking? ". We then become attentive to habits of use. This requires us to bring our soul to life in the objects we use.  Compassion, that is to say, to make our soul live in what a person expresses, is, in a certain way, only one facet of this attitude of soul.

Perhaps it can be said that our efforts to vivify Storgè love allow the ether of life to sparkle in our environment.

3) Philia love guides us to the heart of the soul; With Philia we take into ourselves the other in his ordinary soul form, in what we call his persona. Many children come to us from neat surroundings where everything seems to sparkle with cleanliness, and yet these children seem empty; the beauty of seasonal festivals, concerts, plays, leaves them indifferent. Often it can be noticed that after some time living with us, they become particularly attached to an adult and, thanks to this human bond, their withered soul begins to live. It is not fair to say that children only come to us because they need us: we need them and their need; In this reciprocity of need for each other, a Philia gift of love is offered to the whole world.

All young people at the age of puberty reject the love of Eros and the love of Storgè of their parents, but with what timidity they solicit the charms of Philia. Who does not recognize this story of a young girl who, after a superb scene and angry words spoken against her mother, having obtained money to buy her clothes herself, goes for the first time to buy her clothes alone and shyly on the way back, she asks her father, "Say, do you like my new blouse?".

What process does the educator engage in when with Philia love he bends down to all the slight anomalies that live in the souls of these children: the disjointed thoughts, the oversights, the non-completion of actions? etc... He discovers that under certain conditions, he has exactly these same problems. His sense of responsibility, his conscience tells him: only by striving to overcome these weaknesses in yourself will you generate the strengths that will help the child to overcome them also in them. This induces that the soul of the child can resonate more harmoniously. What lives in the instinctive behavior of the child, in his character, his temperament, is guided to a more harmonious melody when the educator tries to create a balance by his own efforts. Again it is possible for us to cautiously turn our gaze to the work of the ether of Son.

Eros – Awaken; Storgè – let grow; Philia – Balance

4) Agape love does not focus like Philia on what the Healing Pedagogy Course calls "the superficial part of the soul" where the persona lives, but it allows the child or adult to experience of his true being.

In current schools of psychology, there are very interesting reflections on this Agape-love. D. Winicot, for example in his essay "The Mirror Role of the Mother" describes the first smile of the child, and goes on to say that the child does not smile at his mother, but at the image of the baby that the mother carries in her soul. It is like a first confirmation of oneself.

Similarly, in current counseling centres, the essential contribution of therapists is no longer their own interpretation, but consists of offering a mirror that allows parents to get to know themselves better.

Anyone who works with students and guides them knows how radically their support must change when the student is between 28 and 30 years old. The trainer must take his advice and be filled with dedication and interest, listening and letting go so that the young adult can take the step of moving from "Man know yourself" to "Man know yourself (Mensch erkenne dich - Mensch erkenne dich selbst).

There is another area where, in the midst of other children, the higher being of each child can be illuminated, because it is addressed in the most intimate way. It's at the Sunday service.

Moreover, Camphill's wish to have pedagogical meetings devoted to a particular child, requires – if this meeting is to have any real meaning – a very rigorous application of love-Agape.

It is not easy to describe what influence the mask of love-Agape can have on children. Perhaps it is fair to say that this form of love allows the higher being of the child to incarnate at its best. As Mr. Schmidt Brabant once said, "The incarnation of a disabled person can only socially offer real gifts to humanity when his eternal being is recognized as living within him, here and now."

Here I must draw attention to a misinterpretation of love-Agape that we have in our time. Many young people today have a natural gift of tolerance, allowing the being of the other to remain protected. They seem to be in symbiosis with the other's self and yet, very often, the other's true higher being cannot radiate. One could say with Saint Paul: "Now we see through dark glass, but then we will see face to face." Now I know in bits and pieces, but then I will know just as I myself am known." It is as if the mirror that these young people received as a natural gift had not been cleaned and polished by their own efforts, their own abnegation, their strength of sacrifice. That's why they see only a faint glow; fragments of the ego and fragments of the persona become entangled

How can the educator or the social therapist create in themselves this free space, this space where the Ego is purely altruistic? In the same way as during a meditation, my own Self must be awakened at the very heart of the void that I will have created in my soul. When we put ourselves at the service of Agape, only social conscience can guide us. This form of love is no longer stimulated by my friendship, my interest, my care, my enthusiasm which springs up to create, but only, by the need of other human beings.

Perhaps one might dare to say that where human beings through their inner efforts approach this goal, "Then I will know, as I myself am known," there arises darkness, the Ether of light, indicating the Being of light, the flow of love radiating from Christ.


Translation from English to French by Béatrice Leduc

re-translated by Google translate, April 2023

 


Annelies Bruell, born in Germany in 1927, grew up in Holland where she studied law and the German language; She lived and worked at Campphil in Aberdeen from 1957. One of her responsibilities was the training of educators. She was a member of the Training Group in Curative Pedagogy and Sociotherapy at the Goetheanum;

Love and Truth

There is an essential difference between truth and love, and it is the opposite of what most of us used to believe:

Truth can never exist alone. It is a joint effort between at least one person who expresses it and one person who understands it. Sometimes the effort is greater on the side of the one who expresses it, sometimes on the side of the one who understands it, and sometimes appearances are deceptive!

Which leads us to love, which can exist, not of course in isolation but always exclusively on its own foundations. To love is a completely sovereign decision, perhaps the only sovereign decision accessible to us.

Thus, expressing (or “doing”) a truth is an act of love, and understanding it is also an act of love. These 2 free acts are necessary for the truth to exist. But love began before, and above all, it does not depend, on either side, on any condition. She is free and sovereign.

(Inspired from Alain Badiou)

samedi 4 octobre 2025

How to deal with AI?

AI, computers and softwares in general, are demanding that we further loosen the relationship between language and thought. 

In fact computers and softwares are enabled by this loosening of this relationship, following the ground-breaking work of Alan Turing in 1936, when he designed an intellectual computer on paper, and then using this imaginary but working computer, he found the answer to his question: Are all numbers computable? He proved, from the computer he intellectually designed, that the answer is no: There are numbers that we can prove do exist, and at the same time we can also prove that they can not be calculated. One might suspect this question was in fact an excuse for designing this computer. 

Anyway, Turing was among the first to isolate in full details the thought process as a separate object, detached from any material or experiential reality, other than itself, and describing it with such accuracy that it can be materialised, represented with materials. What we have called later "the Turing machine" is the first time a material representation represented not an experiential concept like drawings or words, not an act of thought like a number, not a process like algebra, but the very act of representation itself.

Having isolated this act and represented it in a fully clear and complete way, almost like we isolate chemical elements or viruses (and after having built ad-hoc calculators for British military intelligence to successfully decipher the German submarines communications), Turing proceeded, in the last decade of his life, to build the first physical computer, capable of physically operating and not just on paper.

This isolation of the process of representation in a material object, demands that we enter in a new relationship with our thoughts. We must, if we want to stay free and maybe even alive, apprehend our thought in a way that is more detached from language than it was before computers and AI.

Printing and mechanical reproduction of images has made a similar demand, and before that, drawing and writing.

Each time, the language itself has become an object of language. 

Practically speaking, for architects today, AI and softwares demand that we loosen further the relationship between our thoughts and a given particular language. We must freely move from a software to another, from scale drawing to hand drawing, from calculation to drawing and back, and even from a material to another, and from a shape to another.

If we don't do that effort we run the risk indeed, of becoming trapped in the machine, as is the unavoidable goal of everyone working with AI and softwares: To make them ever more totalitarian -as Lucien Sfez brilliantly described with this word: Tautism, acronym of totalitarian, tautology, and autism, because this constant move towards totalitarism is the only way to make softwares more efficient, and that's not a political choice, it's an unavoidable necessity of the very concept of computers or "Turing machines".

As it turns out, AI which seeks to weaponise our identities, to lock us into our languages, is creating a situation where we must do a conscious and deliberate effort in the opposite direction, and when we meet someone, find ways to understand that person beyond her identity, find a path to that person beyond her and our language. This is a way to de-weaponise our languages and our identities, like a narrow, meandering and dangerous, but very effective, path towards practical love, in the middle of the forest of our misunderstanding and hate, on which AI feeds itself.

Because beyond our languages and our identities, we do not have much else, and by harnessing them, AI holds in its power our core. Destroying our languages and identities would be destroying ourselves. So we have to love them instead, following this narrow path to the other person, this path that AI, like these numbers that Turing has shown exist but cannot be calculated, is unable to understand.

Hats off, Alan Turing! Your first paper was the best.

https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/Turing_Paper_1936.pdf

mardi 23 septembre 2025

War footprint

 Exhibit 1:


🇷🇺🇺🇸🇪🇺 ENERGY WARS IGNITE: A New World Order is Rewriting Global Oil & Gas Rules

This is a US-led power grab to rewire the world's energy grid for global dominance.

The American Agenda: Pressure & Profit

Washington aims to rebalance global energy demand toward US producers by:

🔸Pressure on Europe: Forcing a rapid transition away from Russian energy.

🔸Tariffs on China/India: Punishing continued purchases of Russian oil.

Brussels is trapped

🔸It agreed to the first demand, signing $250B in US energy purchases.

🔸But tariffs on China/India are suicidal, risking energy costs and retaliatory blows to EU industry.

Trump's pressure has clear goals:

🔸Minimum Goal: Monopoly for US firms in the EU + leverage to control Russian supply routes.

🔸Maximum Goal: Drag Europe into a full economic standoff with China.

Russia: Target and Inescapable Partner

🔸Existing infrastructure remains.

🔸US LNG cannot overcome geography, seasonality, or logistics.

🔸This fuels secret negotiations and potential deals.

China and India: Exploiting the Pressure

🔸They are negotiating new discounts on Russian energy.

🔸They benefit from price arbitrage, turning Western pressure into an economic advantage.

EU Fractures: Centers vs. Peripheries

🔸Core (von der Leyen): Pushes accelerated phaseouts and new sanctions.

🔸Periphery (Hungary, Slovakia): Seek exceptions, fearing industrial collapse without Russian crude.

Europe's Impossible Choice

🔸Rapid Rupture: Industry crippled by high costs and an Asian tariff war.

🔸Slow Rupture: Living on "exceptions," losing agency to Washington, and enduring constant uncertainty.

Conclusion: Energy is the Foundation

Oil and gas are one of the primary factors in strategic choices. Reshuffling supply routes reflects a new world order where energy is the foundation of geopolitics. This realignment is a permanent shift, defining the landscape for the long term.

@NewRulesGeo, 23.09.2025


Conclusion for an architect :

The wars of the 21st century are wars over gas, while the wars of the 20th century were wars over oil.

Iran, Iraq-Kuwait, Syria-Qatar, "Islamic State," Israel, Venezuela, Ukraine... nothing but gas fields and pipeline routes. This explains the geography of the battlefields.

These stories about carbon footprints, about "wars of civilizations," are for the little people. Decision-makers run on gas. Solar 😂... no thanks!

The real reason for ecological architecture and organic farming is definitely not to "reduce our carbon footprint": All our food, all plants, all animals, are made primarily of carbon!

The real reason is to avoid fueling wars. It pisses them off, this independence, this uniform slipping off our shoulders while they try to hold it in place with pins, glue, nails... and the uniform keeps slipping, falling to the ground, and no one picks it up, the children step on it...

Architecture made of earth and bamboo isn't about reducing the "carbon footprint"... it's about reducing the "war footprint."

dimanche 3 août 2025

Reclaim your health!

The most accurate word for the architecture I'm trying to do is "hygienic" (in English), or "ayurvedic" (in Indian languages). It means a healthy architecture. 

But I can't use often these 2 words, because the English version will summon images of phenyle, stainless steel, PVC windows and glazed tiles, and the Indian version, superstitious notions of legalistic vastu, where the correctness of an arrangement depends on the delimitation of legal property lines!

Anyway, we are following the advice of our Ayurvedic family doctor, and recently for so-called "long covid" we are also following the low-cost and easily available methods described in these two papers:

"Long covid": These 2 protocols work surprisingly well!

Hulscher, McCullough et al. (2023):

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10663976/

Roberto Zeballos et al. (2025):

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12266371/

lundi 21 juillet 2025

François-Régis Legrier

François-Régis Legrier, 

Revue Défense Nationale, février 2019

"Au XIXe siècle, le sort d'une bataille mettant en jeu quelques milliers d'hommes était réglé en une journée - Austerlitz par exemple; au XXe siècle, il faut compter en semaines - que l'on pense à la poche de Dunkerque en 1940; au XXIe siècle, il faut près de cinq mois et une accumulation de destructions pour venir à bout de 2 000 combattants ne disposant ni d'appui aérien, ni de moyens de guerre électronique, ni de forces spéciales, ni de satellites*. Telle est la réalité de la guerre aujourd'hui qui doit nous conduire, décideurs politiques et chefs militaires à un examen critique salutaire sur notre façon de concevoir et faire la guerre.

Certes, la bataille d'Hajin a été gagnée mais de façon très poussive, à un coût exorbitant et au prix de nombreuses destructions*."

Article complet:

https://disk.yandex.com/i/7D4GCPWrM0ZgIw

Notes:

* note 1: Si l'état islamique ne possédait pas leurs propres satellites, il disposait bien de renseignements fournis par les satellites des puissances occidentales.

* note 2: 80% de la ville de Rakka a été détruite.

mardi 1 juillet 2025

Another beautiful meditation by Yeshayahu Ben-Aharon

...a different language, but deeply, the same thing! Whether you call it "resistance" or "gift to the gods", now is not the time to sleep, but to fight, and to give our best, and to trust our humanity!

https://www.ibecoming.co.il/eng/Blog/941/The-Laying-of-the-Renewed-Foundation-Stone-as-Reversed-Cultus

Yeshayahu Ben-Aharon writes in a warm and fully explicit manner what many authors have expressed in more round-about ways: We are not alone when we think. We bear entire responsibility for our thoughts, but to infer from that that we are alone, is to allow a wrong guest to sneak in, uninvited and unnoticed.

lundi 30 juin 2025

jeudi 12 juin 2025

Merci Rima Hassan !

 

Se rend-on compte qu'une Palestinienne, Rima Hassan, députée française et européenne, née dans un camp de réfugiés palestiniens, est en train de sauver l'honneur de la France, humiliée par Netanyahu depuis des mois, à coup d'insultes contre la présidence de la république ou d'arrestation de gendarmes ?


Ce que Rima Hassan est en train d'accomplir est extraordinaire: une véritable révolution des consciences dans un Occident endormi. C'est une Arabe, une Palestinienne qui donne une leçon à la macronie soumise à Israel. Une eurodéputée et 3 citoyens français kidnappés en eaux internationales, détenus ILLÉGALEMENT depuis 3 jours par un État dirigé par un homme sous mandat d'arrêt de la CPI, sans un mot de condamnation de la France. C'est du jamais-vu.


Elle a subi des violences morales et physiques, et a été placée en isolement solitaire, cellule insalubre, sans fenêtres, pas d’accès à la cour. Elle refuse de signer quoi que ce soit, préfère la prison à la soumission. Rima ne se contente pas de résister : elle nous enseigne le véritable sens de la dignité, de la persévérance et du droit au retour. Elle a écrit « free Palestine » sur le mur de sa cellule, dans une prison israélienne. Voilà ce qu’est le courage !


Elle entame une grève de la faim en protestation contre la violence de sa détention en Israël. Silence des autorités françaises, qui continuent de livrer des armes aux génocidaires.

En France, aucun envoyé spécial, aucune tribune de l'intelligentsia de gauche si prompte à donner des leçons par ailleurs, aucune émission sur les grandes chaînes de télévision pour dénoncer cette situation inédite. Tout le monde se tait, tout le monde a peur. 

Voltaire : " Pour savoir qui vous dirige vraiment, il suffit de regarder ceux que vous ne pouvez pas critiquer."


Espérons que la mobilisation mondiale en cours empêche les israéliens de la tuer ou de l’empoisonner.


Pendant ce temps…

La semaine prochaine se tiendra à l’ONU une énorme réunion internationale pour reconnaître l’Etat Palestinien et plaider pour une solution à deux états, réaction des USA : « Les pays qui prendraient des « actions anti israéliennes » après la conférence seront considérés comme agissant en opposition aux intérêts de la politique étrangère américaine et pourraient faire face à des conséquences diplomatiques de la part de Washington. » L’administration du président américain Donald Trump MENACE les gouvernements du monde entier… incroyable vassalisation du pays le plus puissant du monde.


Francesca Albanese (ONU), hier:

Israel tué 120 Palestiniens en 24 heures.


Les égyptiens, à la demande d'israel et sous pression US, ont bloqué la marche de la caravane d'aide qui avait démarré en Tunisie et s'était enrichie de citoyens du monde entier.


On peut tous faire notre part: boycottez les entrprises qui ont du sang palestinien sur les mains, la liste est sur BDS. C'est efficace, c'est important.

vendredi 11 avril 2025

Covid and morality

If I had been the devil, I would have created the covid. Because I don't know anyone who got vaccinated for an immoral reason. Everyone got vaccinated for preserving their ability, not to enjoy, but to perform their duties: To continue earning for your family, to be able to travel to look after your dependants, sometimes, to conform to the conspiracy theory that you would "stop transmission" and not be a danger to others, and in very few cases that I know, with the hope to protect your own health, which is of course not immoral at all, but not as altruistic as the majority of people's motivation to get vaccinated.

Now, if you set-up conditions that force people to harm themselves out of their higher, altruistic ideal, that is a definition of torture.

Covid has been a mass torture of humanity, a devilish enterprise.

We should not abandon morality. A person who acted out of goodwill should never regret her action, whatever the cost.

But we must understand that intelligence and morality are weapons at the service of each-other. Being moral is not an excuse for not being intelligent, and being intelligent is not an excuse for not being moral. How we make these two forces protect and save each-other is the most difficult work, the work of becoming human.

lundi 24 mars 2025

Michel Rocard, Scott Ritter

Premier ministre Michel Rocard :

"C’est une affaire à millions de morts, l’hypothèse étant que ça commence nucléaire."

https://www.liberation.fr/france/2012/03/02/michel-rocard-on-est-dans-l-imbecillite-politique-collective_799992/


Weapons inspector Scott Ritter:

“Striking Iran isn’t just ripping up treaties, it means that the U.S. would break the taboo that’s been in place since Hiroshima and Nagasaki on the use of the Nuclear Weapons and we will become, by definition, the worst nation in the world, the most evil nation in the world!”

WHY WOULD US FIGHT IN YEMEN?

Interview for Judging Freedom

https://www.youtube.com/live/DSfF59Y6Bhc



mercredi 19 mars 2025

Pepe Escobar

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2025/03/19/hard-rains-gonna-fall-from-west-down-to-east/

Pepe Escobar summarizes our situation like rarely before.

The overall feeling is that Europe is (still) at the centre stage. But that is NEW. Before, Europe WAS the centre stage. Europe was looking at India, China, America, Africa with unlimited passion and lust. Now it is the turn of these countries to look at Europe. But there will be no symmetry. As Escobar writes, Russia is not Faustian. India and China, or Africa, even more evidently less! Escobar is silent about the US. I believe they are not Faustian. Their trajectory is different. Europe is not anymore the centre stage, it is AT the centre stage. Everyone looks with pity, interest and indeed, compassion: How far will Europe go in self-destructive hubris?

lundi 17 mars 2025

Stephan Korinth

Excellent article par un jeune journaliste Allemand indépendant, co-fondateur de ce journal en Allemand avec certains articles traduits en Anglais. 

Ca bouge !!! La vieille Europe n'est pas encore morte !!!

https://multipolar-magazin.de/artikel/the-long-lineage-of-russophobia

samedi 15 mars 2025

Question for today

What would have happened if the US had continued supporting Germany after 1945?

What would have happened if the US had continued supporting East Pakistan after 1971?

What would have happened if the US had continued supporting Cambodia after 1979?

vendredi 14 mars 2025

Achille Mbembe vs Carl Schmitt

"This is not war in the Clausewitzian sense of two sovereign actors vying for victory. It is war in the Schmittian sense, where one side is an object rather than a subject, a battlefield rather than a player. The U.S. does not merely use Ukraine. It governs the conditions of its life."

"The logic of necropolitics, as theorized by the Cameroonian historian Achille Mbembe (b. 1957), is laid bare in the choreography of these negotiations. It is not just about war but about the management of death itself, the strategic control of who is allowed to live and who is left to perish. For Ukraine, existence is contingent upon its usefulness to larger powers, a pawn whose suffering is not a tragedy but a calculated necessity."

Constantin von Hoffmeister, March 2025

https://www.eurosiberia.net/p/necropolitics-ukraine-and-the-trump-brokered-negotiations

Achille Mbembe knows a thing or two about architecture:

https://www.e-flux.com/architecture/coloniality-infrastructure/410015/the-earthly-community/

 

dimanche 9 mars 2025

Racisme du passé et du futur

Il y a beaucoup de malentendus sur la question du racisme parcequ'il y en a deux formes, fondamentalement différentes dans leurs motivations : Le racisme qui juge les gens en fonction de leur passé familial, leurs "gènes", tout ce qu'on attribuait autrefois à la "race", et le racisme qui juge les gens en fonction de leur avenir, ce que les politiciens appellent parfois "la communauté de destin", ou ce dont on parle lorsqu'on dit que certains groupes de personnes, ou institutions, "ont vocation" à faire certaines choses plutôt que d'autres.

Appeler "racisme" la deuxième forme est une analogie, car ça n'a pas grand-chose à faire avec la race, la génétique ou le passé, mais est directement lié à la géographie. C'est un jugement de la personne qui n'est pas motivé par son héritage, ni génétique ni culturel, mais par l'endroit où elle vit.

C'est cette forme moderne de racisme géographique qui explique les guerres aujourd'hui, et non pas le racisme à l'ancienne, basé sur la couleur de peau ou le patrimoine culturel.

Plusieurs philosophes ont caractérisé, à leur manière, ce racisme qui motive les guerres et la politique aujourd'hui. Jacques Rancière l'appelle "le racisme froid", et Alain Badiou l'appelle de manière interchangeable "le racisme d'état" ou "le racisme intellectuel".

Il est important de comprendre les buts et les moyens du racisme froid, ou racisme intellectuel, si l'on veut échapper à son emprise et ne pas se laisser embrigader dans la grande mobilisation générale, la militarisation des identités qui sème la misère et les catastrophes aujourd'hui. 

Sauver l'identité, forme visible, et par conséquent la seule que l'on peut aimer dans la pratique, de ce qui est le plus sacré en chacun de nous, est notre tâche aujourd'hui.

Who is defending terrorism?

Check who is defending terrorism, and with what intellectual arguments.

Note that the introductory paragraph, which was added later by the editor, is totally hypocritical, it's legalese to preempt legal problems following a powerful attack against prof. Viminitz's cynical paper, by one of his former students.

Yes, in a strange twist, reading what your ennemies write often helps in understanding yourself deeper, what you stand for, and why.

There is a deep relation between intellectual work and evil. Without evil, the good would maybe not understand itself. In a sense, evil and intellectual work are two forms of the same thing.

https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2011/12/03/my-open-letter-to-canadas-foremost-philosopher-of-war/

Sixième et dernier tract de la Rose Blanche

Rédigé par le prof. Kurt Huber (le professeur de philosophie de Hans Scholl et Alexander Schmorell), début février 1943 juste après la capitulation allemande à Stalingrad, il s'adresse aux étudiants et sera imprimé à plus de 2 000 exemplaires. Mais quelques jours plus tard, le 18 février 1943, trois membres de la Rose Blanche sont arrêtés par la Gestapo et condamnés à mort ; deux mois plus tard, la Gestapo arrête trois autres membres. L'activité de la Rose Blanche aura duré moins d'un an, mais le sacrifice de ces jeunes a sauvé la réputation de l'Allemagne.

Étudiantes ! Étudiants ! 

La défaite de Stalingrad a jeté notre peuple dans la stupeur. La vie de trois cent mille Allemands, voilà ce qu'a coûté la stratégie géniale de ce soldat de deuxième classe promu général des armées. Führer, nous te remercions !

Le peuple allemand s'inquiète : allons-nous continuer de confier le sort de nos troupes à un dilettante ? Allons-nous sacrifier les dernières forces vives du pays aux plus bas instincts d'hégémonie d'une clique d'hommes de parti ? Jamais plus !

Le jour est venu de demander des comptes à la plus exécrable tyrannie que ce peuple ait jamais endurée. Au nom de la jeunesse allemande, nous exigeons de l'État d'Adolf Hitler le retour à la liberté personnelle; nous voulons reprendre possession de ce qui est à nous; notre pays, prétexte pour nous tromper si honteusement, nous appartient.

Nous avons grandi dans un État où toute expression de ses opinions personnelles était impossible. On a essayé, dans ces années si importantes pour notre formation, de nous ôter toute personnalité, de nous troubler, de nous empoisonner. Dans un brouillard de phrases vides, on voulait étouffer en nous la pensée individuelle, et on appelait cette méthode : «formation pour une conception saine du monde». Par le choix du Führer, un choix comme on n'en pouvait faire de plus diabolique et de plus borné à la fois, des hommes sont devenus des criminels sans dieu, sans honte, sans conscience; il en a fait sa suite aveugle, stupide. Ce serait à nous, «travailleurs intellectuels» de régler son compte à cette nouvelle clique de Seigneurs. Des combattants du front sont traités comme des écoliers par des Chefs de groupe, ou des aspirants Gauleiter.

Il n'est pour nous qu'un impératif : lutter contre la dictature ! Quittons les rangs de ce parti nazi, où l'on veut empêcher toute expression de notre pensée politique. Désertons les amphithéâtres où paradent les chefs et les sous-chefs S.S., les flagorneurs et les arrivistes. Nous réclamons une science non truquée, et la liberté authentique de l'esprit. Aucune menace ne peut nous faire peur, et certes pas la fermeture de nos Écoles Supérieures. Le combat de chacun d'entre nous a pour enjeu notre liberté, et notre honneur de citoyen conscient de sa responsabilité sociale.

          Liberté et Honneur !

Pendant dix longues années, Hitler et ses partisans nous ont rebattu les oreilles de ces deux mots, comme seuls savent le faire les dilettantes, qui jettent aux cochons les valeurs les plus hautes d'une nation. Ce qu'ils entendent par ces mots, ils l'ont montré suffisamment au cours de ces années où toute liberté, matérielle aussi bien qu'intellectuelle, toute valeur morale furent bafouées. L'effusion de sang qu'ils ont répandue dans l'Europe, au nom de l'honneur allemand, a ouvert les yeux même au plus sot. La honte pèsera pour toujours sur l'Allemagne, si la jeunesse ne s'insurge pas enfin pour écraser ses bourreaux et bâtir une nouvelle Europe spirituelle.

Etudiantes ! Etudiants ! Le peuple allemand a les yeux fixés sur nous ! Il attend de nous, comme en 1813, le renversement de Napoléon, en 1943, celui de la terreur nazie.

Bérésina et Stalingrad flambent à l'Est, les morts de Stalingrad nous implorent ! 

Nous nous dressons contre l'asservissement de l'Europe par le National-Socialisme, dans une affirmation nouvelle de liberté et d'honneur.



jeudi 6 mars 2025

La CIA n'oublie pas

La raison que De Gaulle avait donné pour que la France fasse ses propres bombes atomiques était de se doter d'un argument imparable pour pouvoir refuser d'héberger les bombes atomiques américaines sur notre sol, avec tous le pouvoir pour les Américains et tous les risques pour les Français, ce qui aurait annulé le principe même de la dissuasion nucléaire. 

L'Allemagne, l'Italie, la Belgique, n'ont pas ce luxe, et risquent une représaille nucléaire quasi-automatique si des avions Américains lâchent une ou des bombes nucléaires sur l'ex-URSS/Russie après avoir décollé de ces bases.

Il n'est pas difficile d'imaginer ce qu'un politicien US préférera, une bombe lancée depuis l'Europe qui explose en Russie après quelques minutes et qui ne provoquera probablement pas de riposte nucléaire sur le sol Américain, avec une bombe lancée depuis les États-Unis, qui a besoin de plus de temps pour arriver, et déclenchera une riposte automatique et inévitable.

Apparemment Macron n'a pas compris.

Espérons que des militaires Français lui expliqueront, publiquement si nécessaire, un peu de stratégie militaire et d'histoire plutôt récente, même s'il n'était pas né à l'époque. 

La CIA, elle, n'oublie pas, et continue fort logiquement (y compris par une de ses officines médiatiques, ci-bas) de pousser sa charrue, quel que soit l'administration en cours.

https://theconversation.com/la-dissuasion-nucleaire-francaise-est-elle-credible-face-a-la-russie-251243

mercredi 5 mars 2025

I am Zelensky

Russia seems to have finally come to terms with the idea that it's kicked out of Europe, after 200 years of brutal European invasions.

The United States also seem to have cut the umbilical cord, and accepted they are not a distant European colony, not even in the cultural sense. The realisation was condensed in the short, uneasy dialogue of US president Donald Trump and British P.M. Keir Starmer in front of the journalists.

And Europe now also realise they are on their own, as expressed by the Polish P.M. Donald Tusk before taking off for the emergency European meeting in London: "why are 500 million European asking 300 million Americans to protect them from 140 million Russians"? (Donald Tusk could also ask why Napoleo returned from Russia with only 10% of his 600,000-strong army, and the nazi and their Europeans allies didn’t even return at all, despite their massively genocidal tactics, and how today's thoroughly satanic experiment could succeed where the previous 2 failed!)

The European empire was hoping to survive by proxy, through the United States. The Project for a New American Century (PNAC), officially kicked off on 11 September 2001, with a few thousand New Yorkers as unwilling sacrificial victims, immediately followed by millions of Afghans, Irakis, and many others who thought it would not reach them.

The PNAC is not working. The only thing that keeps the empire afloat, the acceptance of the US dollar as an international currency, is being maintained only to keep the US as quiet as possible while their power of nuisance slowly fades. Yemen shoots US drones one after another and scares off US aircraft carriers with hypersonic missiles that the US do not have yet.

So everyone is on their own. The Americans, the Russians, the Chinese, the Europeans, have all accepted the end of the empire.

It is refreshing, but now that deadly illusions are collapsing, is the time more than ever to know our values, and in our times of unprecedented freedom and responsibility, to have the courage to stand by what we really love, by what is really worthy of our respect and love: Other humans, our sisters and brothers.

The few of us who have been spared by war so far, are all like president Zelensky now: The free supply of cocaine is ending, and we are faced with our naked life. What are we, what do we want really?

dimanche 2 mars 2025

Comfortably numb

50 years ago a publishing house was founded in France, called "alternative et parallèles", it published "le Catalogue des Ressources", the French translation of the "Whole Earth Catalog", a wonderful annual publication, ancestor of the internet according to its editor Stewart Brand. They also published in 1979 the French translation of "Shelter" by Lloyd Kahn, which they translated as "Habitats - constructions traditionnelles et marginales". This glorious publishing house has published many excellent books, including the first Earth Construction Manual written by CraTerre -probably the first earth construction manual in the world, and still one of the best- and still exists, under the name "éditions alternatives".

The French painter Pierre Fournier wrote in the first editorial of La Gueule Ouverte in 1972, "Very quickly readers wrote to me to urge me to found, and quicker than that, a "Rousseauist party" intended to "gather the marginals". The marginals - how right they are! not wanting to be gathered, and especially not within a party, whatever its -ism, there was probably better to do".

At the time we were longing to be "marginal" and "different", the "Autrement" (literally, "Differently") publishing house also started in 1975!

"Parallel" schools, "alternative" medicines were cool.

Today, you are no longer "alternative" or "parallel" but "sectarian" or "conspiracy theorist"!

What happened?

Many theories declared unscientific by the authorities (washing your hands before operating on a patient, the idea that cigarettes or asbestos cause cancer, or that the continents move, etc.) have turned out to be true, and many conspiracy stories put forward by the authorities (that Iraqi soldiers took babies out of incubators in 1991, that Saddam Hussein's anthrax rockets could reach London in 45 minutes in 2003, that Covid-19 appeared in a wild animal market, etc.) have turned out to be false.

How do you separate truth from falsehood? In my experience there is no recipe, and no short-cut to actual work. Sometimes you have to not be afraid of making mistakes, and examine a question as freely as possible. And when you understand that you have made a mistake, correct yourself.

I believed, at least once, in a conspiracy theory that I finally recognized was false. And my memory is playing tricks on me! I was quite surprised to discover, in 2008, one of my emails in which I made fun of a friend who said that no plane had crashed into New York on September 11, 2001. I advised her not to spread gossip. In 2008! I thought I had understood long before. Well, no. In 2008, I firmly believed it. Without ever having thought about it, in fact. I was sure of it, that's all. No time to waste on that. I don't know when I started to think about it. In 2010 I had changed my mind. Maybe thanks to this friend, in fact. The problem with beliefs is that we don't notice them. Neither when they arrive, nor when they go away. So "common sense" is not a reliable enough guarantee, and there are surely still false conspiracy theories that I believe in, that I am not yet aware of... After all, this is what Gandhi, René Girard, Jacques Derrida, Julian Assange and many others less well-known have pointed out: To fight structural violence you first have to uncover it, and this process of uncovering (that Gandhi called non-violence) is at the receiving end of a self-righteous and exacerbated violence, that we were more comfortable keeping unnoticed. The uniquely paradoxal song by Pink Floyd, 'comfortably numb', describes this desire to be unaware, this desire for numbness. The paradox is that the song invites a heightened awareness of this desire for numbness, which usually remains unnoticed... and so comfortably so!

The discovery that traditions, if honestly worked with, can come to the rescue of the marginals, is a paradox only in apparence, and this is what "Éditions alternative et parallèles" and others, like architect Hassan Fathy thrived in, what philosopher Jacques Derrida theorised, and it is what Yeshayahu Ben-Aharon called, 14 years ago, "the reversal of the reversal" ('The Event in Science, History, Philosophy and Art').

But there is one thing that today prevents us from discovering our own errors: Denouncing all criticism as a "conspiracy theory". This expression is a convenient refuge for our laziness, the mother of lies!

Joel Sternheimer said that science is the daughter of ethics. Lies are the sons of laziness...

Tranquillement engourdi

Il y a 50 ans une maison d'édition débutait qui s'appelait "alternative et parallèles", elle publiait "le Catalogue des Ressources", la traduction Française du "Whole Earth Catalog", une publication annuelle formidable, ancêtre de l'internet selon son rédacteur Stewart Brand, et "habitats, constructions traditionnelles et marginales", traduction du livre extraordinaire "Shelter" par un autre Américain : Lloyd Kahn. Cette maison d'éditions a publié beaucoup d'excellents livres, y compris le premier, magnifique, manuel de construction en terre par un groupe de jeunes qui s'appelait CraTerre (aujourd’hui le centre mondial le plus renommé pour la recherche et l'enseignement de l'architecture en terre) et existe encore, sous le nom "éditions alternatives".

Pierre Fournier écrivait dans le premier editorial de La Gueule Ouverte en 1972, "Très vite des lecteurs m'écrivirent pour m’enjoindre de fonder, et plus vite que ça, un « parti rousseauiste » destiné à « regrouper les marginaux ». Les marginaux – comme ils ont raison – n’ayant pas envie d’être regroupés, et surtout pas au sein d’un parti, quel que soit son isme, il y avait sans doute mieux à faire".

A l'époque on se vantait d'être marginal et différent, les éditions "Autrement" ont aussi démarré en 1975 !

Les écoles "parallèles", les médecines "alternatives" étaient très cool.

Aujourd'hui, vous n'êtes plus "alternatif" ou "parallèle" mais "sectaire" ou "complotiste" !

Que s'est-il passé ?

Beaucoup de théories déclarées non scientifiques par les autorités (se laver les mains avant d'opérer un malade, l'idée que la cigarette ou l'amiante donnent le cancer, ou que les continents bougent, etc.) se sont avérées vraies, et beaucoup d'histoires de conspiration avancées par les autorités (que les soldats Irakiens avaient sorti les bébés des couveuses en 1991, que les fusées d'antrax de Saddam Hussein pouvaient atteindre Londres en 45 minutes en 2003, que le Covid-19 est apparu dans un marché d'animaux sauvages, etc.) se sont avérées fausses.

Comment séparer le vrai du faux ? Il n'y a pas de recette. Il faut parfois de pas avoir peur de se tromper, et examiner une question aussi librement que possible. Et lorsqu'on comprend que l'on s'est trompé, se corriger.

J'ai cru, au moins une fois, à une théorie du complot dont j'ai finalement reconnu qu'elle était fausse. Et ma mémoire me joue des tours ! J'ai été tout surpris de découvrir, en 2008, un de mes emails ou je me moquais d'une amie qui disait qu'aucun avion n'était tombé sur New York le 11 septembre 2001. Je lui conseillais de ne pas colporter des ragots. En 2008 ! Moi qui croyais avoir compris bien avant. Et bien non. En 2008, j'y croyais fermement. Sans avoir jamais réfléchi, d'ailleurs. J'en étais sûr, c'est tout. Pas de.temps à perdre avec ça. Je ne sais pas quand j'ai commencé à réfléchir. En 2010 j'avais changé d'avis. Peut-être grâce à cette amie, d'ailleurs. Le problème avec les croyances c'est qu'on ne s'en rends pas compte. Ni quand elles arrivent, ni quand elles s'en vont. Donc il y a sûrement encore des théories du complot fausses auxquelles je crois, dont je ne me suis pas encore aperçu que j'y crois...

Après tout, c'est ce que Gandhi, René Girard, Jacques Derrida, Julian Assange et beaucoup d'autres moins connus ont pointé du doigt : Lutter contre la violence structurelle nécessite de la mettre à jour d'abord, ce que Gandhi appelait la non-violence, et ce travail de mise en lumière s'expose à une violence exacerbée et sûre de son bon droit, qu'il eu été bien moins gênant de ne pas réveiller. 

La chanson extraordinairement paradoxale des Pink Floyd, 'comfortably numb' (tranquillement engourdi) dans l'album The Wall (1979), décrit de manière très exacte ce désir de ne pas être au courant, ce désir de s'engourdir:


Bonjour, bonjour !

Il y a quelqu'un là-dedans ?

Hochez un peu la tête si vous m'entendez !

Il y a quelqu'un à la maison ?

Alors, on me dit que vous n'êtes pas en forme ?

Bon, je peux soulager vos douleurs

Et vous remettre d'aplomb.

Détendez-vous, détendez-vous.

Il me faudra quelques renseignements d'abord,

Juste les faits de base.

Pouvez-vous me montrer où ça fait mal ?

- Ca ne fait pas mal, vous vous éloignez. Un bateau au loin, de la fumée à l'horizon. Vous m'apparaissez en vagues, vos lèvres bougent, mais je ne peux pas entendre ce que vous dites. Quand j'étais enfant, j'ai eu la fièvre, j'avais l'impression que mes mains étaient deux ballons, maintenant je ressens la même chose à nouveau. Je n'arrive pas à vous expliquer, vous ne comprendriez pas. Je ne suis pas dans mon état normal.

Un engourdissement agréable m'envahi.

- Bon, je vois. Une toute petite piqûre et tout vas disparaître. Mais vous vous sentirez peut-être un peu malade d'abord. Pouvez-vous vous lever ? Très bien, je pense que ça marche. Ca vous aidera à tenir jusqu'à la fin du spectacle. Bon, il est temps d'y aller.

(Refrain, etc.)

https://youtu.be/x-xTttimcNk

Le génie de ce dialogue est dans le malentendu radical et incurable entre la personne et une sorte d'entité froide, qui incarne la solution médicale ou technique, se donnant pour objectif d'emprisonner encore plus profondément la personne dans cet engourdissement tranquille dont elle pressent qu'il vaudrait mieux en sortir.

Le paradoxe est que cette chanson sollicite une attention aiguë de cette tentation d'engourdissement, qui d'elle-même aurait préféré ne pas se faire remarquer !

Ce retournement est aussi à l'œuvre dans la découverte, à priori paradoxale, que les traditions, si on les travaille honnêtement, peuvent servir les "marginaux", et c'est ce que les Éditions alternative et parallèles" et d'autres comme l'architecte Hassan Fathy faisaient, ce que le philosophe Jacques Derrida théorisait, et que Yeshayahu Ben-Aharon appelait, il y a 14 ans, "le retournement conscient de l'inversion inconsciente" dans son livre  "The Event in Science, History, Philosophy and Art".

Mais il y a une chose qui aujourd'hui empêche de découvrir ses propres erreurs : Dénoncer toute critique comme une "théorie du complot". Cette expression est un refuge commode pour notre paresse, mère du mensonge !

Joël Sternheimer disait que la science est fille de l'éthique. Les mensonges sont fils de la paresse...

7 janvier 2015, rue Nicolas Appert

L’attentat terroriste du 7 janvier 2015 à Charlie Hebdo – et ceux du Bataclan et de l’hyper casher – étaient des rituels satanistes destinés à ancrer la France dans l’OTAN, et ils ont partiellement réussi.

Comme souvent ils font d’une pierre deux coups, et ils n’ont pas loupé Charb, profondément antiraciste, ni ses collègues, et ils auraient sûrement préféré que Nicolino ne survive pas. 

Le seul moyen de surmonter le satanisme c’est d’examiner très attentivement les faits (qui a fourni la logistique et les renseignements, tiré profit du crime, etc.) et d’écouter très attentivement son cœur et celui des autres, y compris et surtout de ceux qu’on n’aime pas (et cela n’implique pas le mépris, mais le respect), et se méfier des récits des « faiseurs ». Il n’y a pas de recette. Nous sommes tous au pied du mur. Y compris pour ne pas être, nous non plus, des « faiseurs »…

samedi 1 mars 2025

Marwa Osman

The spectacle of Volodymyr Zelensky’s visit to the Oval Office wasn’t just a diplomatic embarrassment, it was a brutal reality check for the world order that has dominated for decades. 


The West, which once cloaked its imperial demands in the language of "freedom" and "democracy," has finally shed the last mask. 


Trump didn’t even bother with the pretense. He made it clear: Ukraine is a bargaining chip, not an ally.


This is the inevitable fate of those who place their survival in the hands of a declining empire. 


Zelensky was paraded as a leader of a Western-backed war, only to be discarded the moment his usefulness waned. The arrogance of American exceptionalism has always depended on carefully crafted illusions, but Trump, in his crude transactional style, has exposed the game for what it is.


The consequences of this moment will reverberate far beyond Kyiv or Washington. The world is already divided between those clinging to the crumbling unipolar system and those forging a new, multipolar reality. This rift will widen. Alliances will harden. And as desperation fuels reckless decisions, the world inches closer to what could be the final great war of our era.


When history looks back at this moment, it won’t just see Zelensky’s shame, it will see the unmistakable signs of an empire in its last throes, willing to burn everything before accepting its own decline.


Marwa Osman, Beyrouth


https://t.me/Marwa_OsmanLB

Macron, first Trumpist?

Indéboulonable Macron 1er, déjà prêt à devenir le... 1er Trumpiste d'Europe !


The karma of Sylvestre de Sacy

Pepe Escobar: From Donbass to South Lebanon -- and all across BRICS --it’s all about Resistance

February 28, 2025

For those of us who keep tracking the slings and arrows trespassing the wider geopolitical chessboard, non-stop, it’s an immensely powerful – and humbling – experience to be one day contemplating devastated Avdeyevka, in the heart of the war in Donbass, and one week later struggling to understand the senseless devastation inflicted on villages in south Lebanon, literally in front of occupied Palestine.

It's all about the transcending power of Resistance – uniting Orthodox Christianity in the black soil of Novorossiya to political Shi’ism in the Eastern Mediterranean.  

It’s this close-up, in microcosm, of the tortuous, bloody, pitiless ways of the Angel of History – to remember Walter Benjamin’s searing metaphor – that really illuminate the always shape-shifting Big Picture, and help us to better frame complex historical processes on the move. 

We are now, geopolitically, under the volcano. And one of the key questions ahead that may allow us to better find a way out is how the top BRICS nations will be reacting to the seemingly immovable Forever Wars ethos. 

So let’s keep our feet on the ground. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has just gone through an intriguing Astana process loop. First he was in Turkiye – the new hegemon in Syria, at least in thesis. He met Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan – the former head of Turkish intel – and President Erdogan. 

Even though Turkiye will hardly dare to become a BRICS partner – after it was officially invited at the Kazan summit last year - Ankara simply cannot afford to antagonize Russia, mostly for geoeconomic reasons.

Then Lavrov went to Iran – following up on the Treaty on Comprehensive Strategic Cooperation signed on January 17 in Moscow. 

Lavrov and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi discussed not only the proverbial mutually beneficial trade and economic cooperation agenda – especially on energy and transportation – but also the wider geopolitical chessboard, including ultra-sensitive nodes such as Syria, Yemen, the Persian Gulf, the Caspian, the South Caucasus and Afghanistan, as well as what could happen next for the JCPOA, the Iran nuclear deal. 

Yet the absolutely key imperative remains the Forever Wars chapter in Ukraine – whose resolution (or not) will deeply affect geopolitics for the rest of the century. 

Three years ago, at the start of the SMO, President Putin qualified a series of objectives. NATO responded by seeking to up the ante. 

Examples. Let’s start with a security treaty imposing a demilitarized space on Russia’s western borders, and the return of NATO to its limits circa 1997. NATO responded by expanding in Scandinavia – and now the Baltic chihuahuas, supported by Finland, dream of turning the Baltic Sea into a NATO lake.  

While the Lugansk National Republic has been 100% liberated, Donetsk stands at best at 75%. Kherson was 100% liberated in the summer of 2022, but then there was a retreat; it now stands at 75%. Same with Zaporizhia. 

Ukraine has not been fully demilitarized yet – although the prospects are somewhat encouraging - or denazified (that will be a decade-long process, at least). 

Ukraine as a non-NATO neutral nation remains a real red line to Moscow ahead of upcoming negotiations with Trump 2.0. Same with the acceptance by Kiev of Crimea and the four regions as Russian and the removal of all sanctions against Russia: Washington may remove quite a few, but the vassal EU will keep them all.   

Not to mention it’s still a long and winding road – to put it mildly – for Moscow to eventually de-enclave Transnistria, which would require to establish a transport corridor through  the Kharkov-Transnistria axis as well as Odessa – a Russian city - and securitizing the whole Black Sea littoral. Control of the Black Sea was the prime NATO obsession since before Maidan in 2014.   

When we follow the money regarding the upcoming US-Russia negotiations on Ukraine, it’s clear that what matters for Trump 2.0 is to reestablish the position of American companies in Russia, all the way to buying Russian commodities – as suggested by Putin himself. 

So geoconomics rule – again, bringing us all back to 2013 and the fateful free market agreement between the EU and Kiev. 

Trump 2.0 is building the narrative that European troops – not directly NATO-linked – will be deployed in Kiev after the end of the war. That would fit into a soft power operation of convincing public opinion about NATO’s annexation of rump Ukraine. 

Trump 2.0, meanwhile, is actively transferring to the collapsing EU the role of 100% globalist supporter of Kiev. Follow the money: this means the EU has to pay up. For everything – while the US gleefully exploits what remains of Ukraine’s resources. 

In parallel, in this Kafkaesque universe, Brussels keeps piling up sanctions on Russia while removing sanctions on Syria on the energy and transportation fronts because Damascus, after all, is now ruled by jihadists: “our” jihadists. 

Compounding the circus, clueless EU mutts such as the next BlackRock German chancellor now openly admit, regretfully, that Maidan, from the start, was in fact aimed against Brussels. The American goal – way before the toxic distribution of Nuland’s cookies – was to sever the EU from Russia and destroy it as a technological competitor. Mission accomplished.     

Of course, in such a Kafkaesque domain, none of the above is enough to change the EU narrative. Brussels wants to allocate yet another 20 to 40 billion euros (which they don’t have) and an “unimaginable” amount of (American) weapons to Kiev, as stated by Hungary’s Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto.  

Follow the money – and the shadow play 

Back on the Ukraine front, Putin has actually suggested that Zaluzhny might replace the current cracked actor in a sweaty sweatshirt. The MI6 is undoubtedly currently preparing Zaluzhny in London exactly for such a role. 

As for military budget cuts, Putin also accepts Trump’s idea of dividing them by half (China politely disagrees). Were that to happen, Russia’s budget would roughly be back to what it was before the SMO, while the Americans would have to cut off $400 billion. Elon Musk’s DOGE will be thrilled; the Deep State will fight it to death. 

For all the intertwined shadow play that is taking place on all fronts, invisible to public opinion, there is an undercurrent of skeptical dissent in Moscow according to which after three years of a narrative insisting the Ukraine war was a US war on Russia (certainly by the globalist Democrat axis), plus the Ukrainian biolabs, the tsunami of sanctions, the Nord Stream bombings, Moscow is now willing to re-start economic cooperation with Washington from scratch. 

Of course it’s not so simple. But there are indeed fears that a possible “peace” deal may turn out to be yet another American “follow the money” win.

Whatever happens next – and no one knows what that will be – the fact remains that it’s Putin who’s now in charge of this new chapter of the Art of the Deal, swiftly dodging veiled threats and non-stop bullying and reverting them Sun Tzu-style.   

Putin cannot possibly accept European “peace keepers” in Ukraine because Russian public opinion will never accept it. 

Without making a single move, just playing Sun Tzu, Putin has already made Trump humiliate the Kiev actor in front of the whole planet and de facto relegate the EU to the dustbin of History.  

And yet, once again, this nagging feeling persists across well-informed circles in Moscow that a few Ukraine-related deals on the end of the war have already been clinched in the background. That explains why certain Russian and American outbursts seem to be too well synchronized.  

Once again, shadow play. And follow the money. When Putin talks about possible joint US-Russian investments on aluminum production in Siberia, he’s thinking about sanctions being erased on Russia’s aluminum industry. 

Same with American investments in Donbass: that will imply the regions are Russian. From all that, there will be a cascade of suppressed sanctions on the sectors of the Russian banking system involved in foreign trade. That’s hardcore geopolitics in action. 

The China-Russia front – involving a deeply complex comprehensive strategic partnership - is way more complex. Much more than BRICS, Beijing’s priority is BRI, the Belt and Road Initiative, or New Silk Roads, the overarching geoeconomics framework of Chinese foreign policy: opening new markets for Chinese products, globally. 

The EU was supposed to be the top final destination of the BRI network. So now there is a serious dichotomy in play. 

Beijing was thrown seriously off balance by the de facto Russian demolition of the EU’s cash flow via the SMO: that reduced the actual value of the EU market for BRI. 

Yet in parallel, Russia’s fast as lightning resurgence as a great military power, strategically defeating the whole collective West, has unveiled a few new tricks to Beijing ahead of its epic confrontation with Trump 2.0 – which does see China as the eminent threat to the Empire of Chaos.  

In the end, it's all about Resistance. From Donbass to the Eastern Mediterranean, from BRICS Iran to BRICS Russia. China, meanwhile, is watching the – geopolitical - river flow, and learning everything there is to learn. 


A brilliant view from Pepe Escobar!

We can see "the karma of Sylvestre de Sacy", the French intellectual who accompanied Napoleo in his Asian wars, and wanted to "excite Muslim fanaticism against Russian orthodoxy"! Europe's only partners now are indeed these farcical "Muslim fanatics" (Islamic State in Syria), while Muslims and Orthodox collaborate to build the multipolar world, and Trump understood that as for now, the US would loose a direct war against Russia so better make a ceasefire with BRICS and have the Europeans pay for the mess. 

samedi 22 février 2025

Prisoniers Israéliens libérés

 https://t.me/internationalreporters/69545

Et Yeshayahu ben Aharon :

https://www.ibecoming.co.il/eng/Blog/980/Humans-are-the-True-Extraterrestrials

dimanche 5 janvier 2025

To those worried about the climate

To those worried about the climate, and more precisely (because I am not talking about the micro-climate or the regional climate, but about the global "climate" in the sense given to it by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC) to those who think that:

1. the earth is warming, and that

2. this warming is due to the greenhouse effect, and that

3. carbon dioxide is the cause of the greenhouse effect, I ask:

Are you doing something, practically, to solve the problem that concerns you? If so, have you found a way to verify the effectiveness of your action? And if not, what is the practical consequence of your climate concern?

For example, here are some practical, easy actions taken from my personal experience, whose effectiveness is easily verifiable:

- to reduce air pollution in the city: Walk, cycle, use public transport, refuse electric vehicles - which pollute more because of their weight and tyre wear.

- to reduce soil pollution: Reduce electrical gadgets, keep your cell phone and computer longer (continue to use it even when the battery, after 6 or 7 years, no longer takes a charge), continue using old, lightweight and "offline" software, refuse electric bicycles,  scooters and cars, eat less meat, eat more organic products, avoid plastic bags...

- to reduce pollution in homes and fight against the epidemic of catastrophic fires: Eliminate plastics (including plywood and particle boards or "OSB" full of glue), PVC floorings, polyurethane foam sofas and beds (yes, 95% of IKEA is to be rejected), and even acrylic paints and "vitrification" of wooden floors and even certain "linseed oils" which contain chemical hardeners, and prefer lime paint and mustard or other natural oils, in short, make your house thinking of your baby crawling on the floor and putting everything, absolutely everything, in her mouth. It is not always easy, but very simple, and doable without asking "experts".

- to fight against desertification and the poisoning of water and soil: Refuse pesticides and "pest control", plant diverse and local species, preserve wetlands, use dry toilets.

- to fight against the increase in our economic vulnerability: Make bioclimatic homes, cities and factories, where natural light, natural ventilation and passive solar design ensure a comfortable climate without depending on machines (which humanity has done for 12,000 years until 1950-80, and continues to do in many regions of the world);

- to fight against world hunger: Refuse necrofuels and burn, in vehicles or for heating, exclusively fossil fuels (gas or petrol) or otherwise, agricultural waste that you produce yourself (pruning branches, dead leaves, etc.)

- to fight against the deterioration of the (micro) climate: Refuse artificialization of soils, plant trees (local and diverse);

- to respect our children and grandchildren: Refuse nuclear energy.

Etc. etc. Only simple, feasible things, easy to understand, explain, verify, prove. Nothing controversial, by the way.

Compare with the crazy or criminal, unverifiable "solutions" of the apostles of the "climate"...

What is "scientific"?

An action whose effects can be verified immediately and by our own means?

or complicated theories that do not lead to any concrete action with verifiable effects?

Unfortunately, late Bruno Latour, who argued that science is the product of scientific institutions and not the other way around, has successfully given theoretical foundations to contemporary political philosophy, that of Covid, Nuclear Power, Liberal Nazism, Democratic Genocide, Jihadism in Business Suit, and War abroad as a guarantee of "Peace" at home. 

Aux angoissés du climat

Aux angoissés du climat, et plus précisément (car je ne parle pas du micro-climat ou du climat régional, mais du "climat" global au sens que lui donne le Groupe d'Experts Intergouvernemental sur l'Evolution du Climat, GIEC) à ceux qui pensent que 1. la terre se réchauffe, que 2. ce réchauffement est dû à l'effet de serre, et que 3. le gaz carbonique est la cause de l'effet de serre, je demande :


Faites-vous, en pratique, quelquechose pour résoudre le problème qui vous préoccupe ? Si oui, avez-vous trouvé le moyen de vérifier l'efficacité de votre action ? Et sinon, quelle est la conséquence pratique de votre souci climatique ?

Par exemple, voici tirés de mon expérience personnelle, quelques actions pratiques, faciles et dont l'efficacité est facilement vérifiable :

- pour réduire la pollution de l'air en ville : marcher, faire du vélo, utiliser les transports en commun, refuser les véhicules électriques -qui polluent plus à cause de leur poids et de l'usure des pneus.

- pour réduire la pollution des sols: réduire les gadgets électriques, faire durer son portable et son ordinateur (continuer à l'utiliser même quand la batterie, après 6 ou 7 ans, ne prend plus de charge), continuer d'utiliser les vieux logiciels, refuser le vélo ou le scooter ou la voiture électrique, manger moins de viande, manger plus de produits bio, ne plus utiliser de sacs en plastique...

- pour réduire la pollution des habitations et lutter contre l'épidémie d'incendies catastrophiques : éliminer les plastiques (y compris contre-plaqués et panneaux de particules ou "triply" bourrés de colles), les revêtements de sol en PVC, les sofas et lits en mousse de polyuréthane (oui, 95% d'IKEA est à refuser), et même les peintures acryliques et "vitrification" de parquets et même certaines "huiles de lin" qui comprennent des durcisseur chimiques, et préférer la peinture à la chaux, bref, faire sa maison en pensant à un bébé qui rampe par terre et met tout, absolument tout, à sa bouche. C'est pas toujours facile, mais très simple, et faisable sans demander à des "experts".

- pour lutter contre la désertification et l'empoisonnement de l'eau et des sols : refuser les pesticides, planter des espèces diverses et locales, préserver les zones humides, utiliser des toilettes sèches.

- pour lutter contre l'accroissement de notre vulnérabilité économique : faire des habitations, des villes et des usines bioclimatiques, où la lumière naturelle, la ventilation naturelle et le chauffage solaire passif assurent une ambiance confortable sans dépendre de machines (ce que l'humanité a fait depuis 12 mille ans jusqu'à 1950-80, et continue à faire dans beaucoup de régions du monde);

- pour lutter contre la faim dans le monde : refuser les nécrocarburants et ne brûler, dans les véhicules ou pour se chauffer, que des carburants fossiles (gaz ou pétrole) ou sinon, des déchets agricoles que l'on produit soi-même (branches d'élagage, feuilles mortes, etc.)

- pour lutter contre la détérioration du (micro) climat : refuser l'artificialisation des sols, planter des arbres (locaux et divers);

- pour respecter nos enfants et petits-enfants : refuser l'énergie nucléaire.

Etc. etc. Que des choses simples, faisables, faciles à comprendre, à expliquer, à vérifier, à prouver. Rien de controversé, d'ailleurs.

Comparez avec les "solutions" loufoques ou criminelles, invérifiables, des apôtres du "climat"...

Qu'est-ce qui est "scientifique" ? 

Une action dont les effets sont vérifiables immédiatement et par nos propres moyens ?

ou des théories compliquées qui ne débouchent sur aucune action concrète aux effets vérifiables ?

Malheureusement, Bruno Latour, qui dit que la science est le produit des institutions scientifiques et pas le contraire, a défini la philosophie politique contemporaine, celle du covid, du nucléaire, du nazisme libéral, du génocide démocratique, du jihadisme encravaté et de la guerre chez les autres comme garantie de la paix chez soi.